Clint Eastwood’s Hereafter tells three tales separated by time, distance and class, ties them together at the end, and leaves us feeling like we never really got into any of them.
In Tale 1, a beautiful and rich Frenchwoman has a near death experience and embarks on a journey of discovery about what we think we know about the afterlife. In Tale 2, a boy loses his twin brother in a tragic accident and deals with the disillusionment that comes from seeing a variety of frauds who claim to be able to help him get in touch with his beloved sibling. In Tale 3, a legitimate psychic tries to run from his gift because it’s virtually impossible to build a life when you spend all your time working with the dead.
Here’s the problem: unlike, say Amores Perros, which juggles its tales in a way that keeps us invested in all of them simultaneously, Hereafter makes us wish the damn thing would settle down with one story and tell it properly. Just as we get in to a particular character’s life, the film changes focus and we feel frustrated. Hereafter would have been much better served by telling its three stories one a time, then putting them together in last 15 minutes.
I like Clint Eastwood. I like this film’s performers. I’d have loved to have gotten lost in Hereafter. But this film errs in its structure, and it doesn’t work as well as it could. Bummer.