Tigerland is your
mark one, mod zero movie about a rebellious military draftee sticking it to The
Man. Unlike Catch-22, which has something to say about the arbitrary nature of
life and death or M*A*S*H, which is
laugh-out-loud funny, Tigerland only
succeeds in showcasing a petulant jerk and trying to make a hero of him.
Colin Farrell plays the jerk, a Vietnam-era draftee trying
his best to fail out of infantry school.
He’s amused to find himself in the middle of a “platoon movie,” complete
with earnest writer, redneck sociopath, doo-wop group, reluctant hero, and even
good- and bad-guy sergeants (As with most platoon movies, Tigerland is actually about a squad. Platoons consist of 36 people, squads 12. 36 characters are just too many for
most films to handle.). He intentionally misses targets on the range. He sabotages equipment. He undermines his unit’s training at
every opportunity. Of course, he’s
a natural soldier and a brilliant leader and could save lives in country if only
he’d apply himself. I was supposed
to root for him. Instead, I spent
the film thinking, “I’m sure glad we don’t have a draft any more.”
See, the problem with a draft is that it forces a military
organization to deal with people who don’t want to be there. It’s hard enough to train, motivate,
and discipline volunteers. Once
you have to waste time corralling troublemakers you can’t simply release for
fear of opening a floodgate of calculated insubordination, you can’t get that
time back for teaching your people they skills they need to survive and execute
your mission.
So I never bought into the movie. I didn’t accept its “screw the Army” ethos. I didn’t believe in its characters any
more than it did (The Reluctant Hero actually says, “What do you think I am,
the Reluctant Hero?” I rolled my eyes.).
I spent more time ruminating on the draft than I did caught up in the
narrative. Tigerland just did not work for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment