WARNING: MAJOR SPOILERS FOR FOCUS AHEAD. This is a
“con” movie, so these spoilers could ruin things. Nevertheless, I don’t think I can write about the film
without spoiling it. Sorry.
Ok. You’ve been
warned.
I have three problems with Focus. First, it’s a
con movie without a long con, only shorter cons that keep the action
moving. Second, it has a romantic
element that’s kind of creepy.
Third, costar Margot Robbie, while particularly attractive, is not
a particularly good actress.
First, the con.
Early in the film, Smith specifically tells Robbie to misdirect, to
deceive, to make the con so invisible to the mark that the mark doesn’t trip
until the con man is far away. It
worked on me, because I was misdirected.
I spent the whole movie focused on Robbie, trying to sniff out her
misdirections and the long con she had to be pulling on Smith. But, alas, there was no long con. What kind of a con movie leaves out the
long con, the one in which the student outwits the master? Or, at least, the one in which the
student thinks she’s outwitted the
master, only to find out she’s been
the mark all along. Alas, no. Focus
starts out a promising film about the art of the con, but ultimately it just
fizzles out into another BS love story.
And there I was, staying focused for 90 minutes for no reason
whatsoever. I mean, c'mon. It's right there in the title: the imperative Focus. If you aren't going to follow through on your title, why bother?

Third, Robbie has this scene in which she’s supposed to
break down and cry. She can’t
quite pull this off, so she does that thing where she covers her face with her
hands and just sorta heaves her shoulders up and down a few times. I don’t care how attractive an actress
is: if she isn’t willing to learn her craft, I’m not willing to spend 90
minutes watching her.
So, there you have it: no long con, no compelling love
story, one poor performance in a major role. Focus on another film.
No comments:
Post a Comment